Class version update unit test fix

[smuzaffar]

This should fix the failing TestFWCoreReflectionClassVersionUpdate unit test.

There was a bug and scram build was not running the edm class version that is why scram build (run via this test) was not failing. The bug has been fixed so scram build now correctly fails which causes this unit test to not work.

This change allows scram to build the test library without running edm class checks during the scram build phase.

Fixes #46869

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[smuzaffar]

please test for CMSSW_15_0_X

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46870/42898

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar for master.

It involves the following packages:

• FWCore/Reflection (core)

@Dr15Jones, @makortel, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @missirol, @wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[smuzaffar]

please test for CMSSW_15_0_DEVEL_X

[smuzaffar]

unit tests passed now for DEVEL IB PR tests

[makortel]

Thanks @smuzaffar!

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-42b874/43251/summary.html
COMMIT: f61656e
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_0_X_2024-12-04-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/46870/43251/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
2024.202001 step 1
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 11 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 45
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3393039
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 465
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3392554
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 44 files compared)
• Checked 198 log files, 168 edm output root files, 45 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-42b874/43252/summary.html
COMMIT: f61656e
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_0_DEVEL_X_2024-12-04-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/46870/43252/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
2024.202001 step 1
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• You potentially added 126 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 26 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 45
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3393039
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1488
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3391531
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 44 files compared)
• Checked 198 log files, 168 edm output root files, 45 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[smuzaffar]

+core

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[smuzaffar]

urgent

[smuzaffar]

type bugfix

[smuzaffar]

@cms-sw/orp-l2 , can you please review this?

[mandrenguyen]

+1