Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CPP20][Visualization] Remove deprecated implicit capture of this in FWTEveViewer #45078

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

iarspider
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Remove deprecated implicit capture of this in FWTEveViewer:

src/Fireworks/Core/src/FWTEveViewer.cc: In lambda function:
  src/Fireworks/Core/src/FWTEveViewer.cc:80:27: warning: implicit capture of 'this' via '[=]' is deprecated in C++20 [-Wdeprecated]
    80 |   m_thr = new std::thread([=]() {
      |                           ^
src/Fireworks/Core/src/FWTEveViewer.cc:80:27: note: add explicit 'this' or '*this' capture

PR validation:

Bot tests

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 28, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45078/40394

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @iarspider for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Fireworks/Core (visualization)

@alja, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alja this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@iarspider iarspider changed the title [CPP20] Remove deprecated implicit capture of this in FWTEveViewer [CPP20][Visualization] Remove deprecated implicit capture of this in FWTEveViewer May 28, 2024
@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test for CMSSW_14_1_CPP20_X

@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9785eb/39581/summary.html
COMMIT: 4e40d5c
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_CPP20_X_2024-05-27-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/45078/39581/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9785eb/39582/summary.html
COMMIT: 4e40d5c
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-05-28-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/45078/39582/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3338862
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3338842
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

smuzaffar commented May 28, 2024

@alja , please use +1 or +visualization comment to approve the PR. cms-bot does not use the reviewer's approval for signatures :-)

@iarspider
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cms-sw/visualization-l2 gentle ping

@alja
Copy link
Contributor

alja commented May 31, 2024

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@alja
Copy link
Contributor

alja commented May 31, 2024

@alja , please use +1 or +visualization comment to approve the PR. cms-bot does not use the reviewer's approval for signatures :-)

@smuzaffar Thanks for letting me know.

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants