Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BrokenLineFit and RiemannFit: mask asserts behind DEBUG flags #44801

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Apr 22, 2024

PR description:

Fixes #44786.
As described in the issue this will avoid triggering assertion failures on GPU when running the example in #44786 (comment), this - incidentally - is also the status quo on CUDA, see #44786 (comment).
Implements masking assertions behind compilation flag BROKENLINE_DEBUG as per #44786 (comment).

PR validation:

#!/bin/bash -ex

# CMSSW_14_0_5_patch2

hltGetConfiguration run:379617 \
  --globaltag 140X_dataRun3_HLT_v3 \
  --data \
  --no-prescale \
  --no-output \
  --max-events -1 \
  --input /store/group/tsg/FOG/debug/240417_run379617/run379617_ls0329_index000242_fu-c2b02-12-01_pid3327112.root  > hlt.py
  
cmsRun hlt.py &> hlt.log

runs fine in this branch.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, might want to backport to CMSSW_14_0_X for the next online data-taking release.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 22, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@mmusich mmusich changed the title BrokenLineFits: mask asserts behind BROKENLINE_DEBUG BrokenLineFits: mask asserts behind BROKENLINE_DEBUG flag Apr 22, 2024
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44801/40042

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoTracker/PixelSeeding (reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @jfernan2 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mtosi, @mmusich, @missirol, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @VourMa, @rovere, @felicepantaleo, @VinInn, @gpetruc, @JanFSchulte, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

fwyzard commented Apr 22, 2024

@mmusich , there is an identical check also in RecoTracker/PixelSeeding/plugins/alpaka/RiemannFit.dev.cc.
Could you update that in the same way ?

@mmusich mmusich changed the title BrokenLineFits: mask asserts behind BROKENLINE_DEBUG flag BrokenLineFit and RiemannFit: mask asserts behind DEBUG flags Apr 23, 2024
@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 23, 2024

Could you update that in the same way ?

thanks for the suggestions. All implemented now.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44801/40056

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #44801 was updated. @mandrenguyen, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2 can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 23, 2024

test parameters:

  • enable = gpu
  • workflows = 12434.402,12434.403,12434.404
  • workflows_gpu = 12434.402,12434.403,12434.404
  • workflow_opts = -w upgrade
  • workflow_opts_gpu = -w upgrade

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 23, 2024

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-939360/39018/summary.html
COMMIT: 3c36fcd
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-04-22-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
Additional Tests: GPU
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/44801/39018/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

GPU Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 20 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 71813
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 926
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 70887
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 4 files compared)
  • Checked 19 log files, 22 edm output root files, 5 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 23, 2024

urgent

@antoniovilela
Copy link
Contributor

I have the impression this -as is - will be rejected, but opening just in case we need it later.

Why?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Apr 23, 2024

Why?

the discussion at #44786 was not yet fully converged. Removed.

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

HLT farm crash in run 379617 (part-2)
6 participants