-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[14.0.X] BrokenLineFit
and RiemannFit
: mask asserts behind DEBUG
flags
#44808
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for CMSSW_14_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@jfernan2, @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
cms-bot internal usage |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e73b79/39019/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
|
urgent
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport of #44801
PR description:
Fixes #44786.
As described in the issue this will avoid triggering assertion failures on GPU when running the example in #44786 (comment), this - incidentally - is also the status quo on CUDA, see #44786 (comment).
Implements masking assertions behind compilation flag
BROKENLINE_DEBUG
as per #44786 (comment).PR validation:
runs fine in this branch.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
verbatim backport of #44801 to 14.0.X for HLT online data-taking purposes.