-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
XGBoost producer bugfix and unit test fix for non-x86_64 (14_0_X) #44532
XGBoost producer bugfix and unit test fix for non-x86_64 (14_0_X) #44532
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @smorovic for CMSSW_14_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@mandrenguyen, @jfernan2, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
cms-bot internal usage |
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
… ARM and PPC architectures. Apparently "abs" is a floating point variant round only on x86_64, so converting it to std::abs
3fcd932
to
a0ed168
Compare
Pull request #44532 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @jfernan2 can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ca99f7/38411/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Pull request #44532 was updated. @jfernan2, @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ca99f7/38461/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
type bug-fix |
backport of #44531 |
type egamma |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
It has been reported that inference in the unit test does not pass on ARM and PPC architectures, so, in agreement with HLT, we leavel the unit test check only for x86_64 (which is sufficient for HLT workloads).
Below is the log of tests which were failing on ARM64 and ppc 64 LE. This always with same numerical values on these two architecture. Cause of that will be investigated.
UPDATE: another commit was pushed. This fixes another problem with the XGBoost photon producer. It was not scaling e2x2 variable by SC energy (s4). It should not impact the unit test.
PR validation:
Unit test unchanged for x86_64 and should pass on all architectures now.
… ARM and PPC architectures, so leaving the check only for X86_64
PR description:
PR validation:
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
backport of #44531
Update: caused by behavior of
abs
. As in the master PR, a fix switching tostd::abs
is pushed.