-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
XGBoost producer bugfix and unit test fix for non-x86_64 (14_1_X) #44531
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44531/39663
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
79fee98
to
8455fbc
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44531/39664
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smorovic for master. It involves the following packages:
@jfernan2, @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3e1d4/38384/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
… ARM and PPC architectures. Apparently "abs" is a floating point variant round only on x86_64, so converting it to std::abs
8455fbc
to
6c089c9
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44531/39698
|
Pull request #44531 was updated. @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @cmsbuild can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3e1d4/38460/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
type bug-fix |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
type egamma |
+1 |
It has been reported that inference in the unit test does not pass on ARM and PPC architectures, so, in agreement with HLT, we leavel the unit test check only for x86_64 (which is sufficient for HLT workloads).
Below is the log of tests which were failing on ARM64 and ppc 64 LE. This always with same numerical values on these two architecture. Cause of that will be investigated.
UPDATE: another commit was pushed. This fixes another problem with the XGBoost photon producer. It was not scaling e2x2 variable by SC energy (s4). It should not impact the unit test.
PR validation:
Unit test unchanged for x86_64 and should pass on all architectures now.
Update: found to be caused by using
abs
which behaves differently on ARM and PPC.Fix which changes to std::abs has been pushed.