-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implementation of TauWPThreshold without need to catch exceptions [13_3_X] #43911
Implementation of TauWPThreshold without need to catch exceptions [13_3_X] #43911
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mbluj for CMSSW_13_3_X. It involves the following packages:
@jfernan2, @cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
cms-bot internal usage |
@cmsbuild, please test |
type tau |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT AddOn Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test runtestRecoTauTagRecoTau had ERRORS RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
AddOn Tests
Expand to see more addon errors ... |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-494f96/37336/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
backport of #43890 |
+reconstruction |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
As title says, this PR implements parsing of threshold values in the
TauWPThreshold
class using function which does not require catching exceptions. Namely, it replaces usage ofstd::stod
bystd::strtod
.It addresses #39627 independently raised also here #43100 (comment).
Backport of #43890
PR validation:
Identical to #43890 and validated for it.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Backport of #43890 to 13_3_X release series for consistency of current production release sereies.