Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[13.2.X] Put back wf 140.6 in the relval matrix #42661

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 25, 2023

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Aug 25, 2023

backport of #42600

PR description:

#42545 removed 140.60 from the relval matrix. This PR recreates it, but using instead full 2022 RAW data format, emulate the RAW' and then reconstruct using the approximated clusters workflow (as discussed in #42495 (comment))

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py -l 140.58,140.60 -t 4 -j 8 --ibeos runs fine

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Verbatim backport of #42600 to 13.2.X for 2023 heavy ion testing purposes.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 25, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_13_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)
  • Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)

@perrotta, @rappoccio, @bbilin, @srimanob, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @miquork, @antoniovilela, @sunilUIET, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos, @VourMa, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @mmusich, @sameasy, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 25, 2023

@cmsbuild please test workflow 140.6

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5bfda1/34477/summary.html
COMMIT: f421b81
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-08-24-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/42661/34477/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 15 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3196410
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3196385
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Aug 25, 2023

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 this PR would be useful for testing possible further bug-fixes needed for the 2023 HI run, please take a look.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+operations

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

@sunilUIET
Copy link
Contributor

+pdmv

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit f42df1f into cms-sw:CMSSW_13_2_X Aug 25, 2023
@mmusich mmusich deleted the dev_putBack140.6_13_2_X branch August 25, 2023 21:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants