-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[13_0_X] Addition of 2023 WFs and Fixing NANO step (Fix typo) #42191
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for CMSSW_13_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @bbilin, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ba4325/33561/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+Upgrade A clone of #42089 with typo fix. Change is expected due to HLT step. |
+pdmv |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this already missed the deadline for the CMSSW_13_0_10 release, I would profit and fix also the comment line, in order to avoid possible problems when it will get uncommented.
backport of #42069
) |
Pull request #42191 was updated. @cmsbuild, @bbilin, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
workflows[140.116] = ['',['RunCommissioning2022D','HLTDR3_2023','RECONANORUN3_reHLT','SKIMCOMMISSIONINGRUN3_reHLT']] | ||
workflows[140.117] = ['',['RunCosmics2022D','HLTDR3_2023','RECOCOSMRUN3_reHLT','SKIMCOSMICSRUN3_reHLT']] | ||
#workflows[140.118] = ['',['RunParkingBPH2022B','HLTDR3_2023','RECONANORUN3_reHLT','SKIMPARKINGBPHRUN3_reHLT']] | ||
workflows[140.104] = ['',['RunZeroBias2022D','HLTDR3_2022','RECONANORUN3_reHLT','SKIMZEROBIASRUN3_reHLT']] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need a ZB flavor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need a ZB flavor
ah, there is 140.063] = ['',['RunZeroBias2022D'
.
Is this just a no-DQM production like setup?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question @slava77
Looking in master, this workflow produce DQM from RECONANORUN3_ZB_reHLT_2022 (or RECONANORUN3_reHLT in 13_0). But there is no harvesting step.
@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 Is this your intention, or missing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
master
@srimanob @slava77 I am not sure of the use case of WFs 140.104-140.118. For consistency, I changed the DQM sequence to ZeroBias 140.104 as well but missed the changes in the Harvesting step. As the ZeroBias DQM request is initially from tracking @mmusich, as per their need either we can revert back to standard DQM or update harvesting step for this WF.
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ba4325/33595/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+Upgrade I would propose to merge this PR as is, and fix for harvesting in different PRs, follow the fix in master. |
+pdmv |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This is a clone of #42089 with typo-fix, MINIAOOD => MiniAOD [here]
PR validation:
Run wf
140.001
which failed in IB before.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
This is a backport PR.