-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[13_0_X] Addition of 2023 WFs and Fixing NANO step #42089
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @sunilUIET (sunil bansal) for CMSSW_13_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @bbilin, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
est parameters: relvals_opt= -w standard |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-aa5c1d/33387/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Pull request #42089 was updated. @cmsbuild, @bbilin, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee can you please check and sign again. |
1 similar comment
Pull request #42089 was updated. @cmsbuild, @bbilin, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee can you please check and sign again. |
test parameters: relvals_opt= -w standard |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-aa5c1d/33398/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+pdmv |
@srimanob do see the issue now. |
@sunilUIET when you are ready with this backport please don't forget to prepare also the PR to backport in 13_1_X |
Is this PR ready to go, or you need to fix? |
@srimanob I fixed it. I was wondering if you still see the issue you mentioned earlier. Sorry I could not check it from the logs |
I think if you summarize on 139.001 then we should be good to go. @sunilUIET |
+pdmv |
Sorry @sunilUIET |
@srimanob it is done |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@sunilUIET this still misses the backport to 13_1_X: let wait for it being at least submitted before merging this PR in the older 13_0_X cycle |
+1
|
Hi @perrotta I am not fully available this week. I will work on the backport next week. |
@sunilUIET all newly added worklows are failing in the CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-07-04-2300 IB |
There was a typo |
steps['RECONANORUN3_reHLT']=merge([{'-s':'RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,PAT,NANO,DQM:@standardDQM+@miniAODDQM+@nanoAODDQM'},steps['RECODR3_reHLT']]) | ||
steps['RECONANORUN3_ZB_reHLT']=merge([{'-s':'RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,PAT,NANO,DQM:@rerecoZeroBias+@miniAODDQM+@nanoAODDQM'},steps['RECODR3_reHLT']]) | ||
steps['RECOCOSMRUN3_reHLT']=merge([{'--scenario':'cosmics','-s':'RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,DQM','--datatier':'RECO,DQMIO','--eventcontent':'RECO,DQM'},steps['RECONANORUN3_reHLT']]) | ||
steps['RECONANORUN3_reHLT']=merge([{'-s':'RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,PAT,NANO,DQM:@standardDQMFakeHLT+@miniAODDQM+@nanoAODDQM','--datatier':'RECO,MINIAOD,NANOAOD,DQMIO','--eventcontent':'RECO,MINIAOOD,NANOEDMAOD,DQM'},steps['RECODR3_reHLT']]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typo here MINIAOOD
Add 2023 WFs and fix the reco step to store Nano output.
This is a partial backport of #42069 and #42047
There is a change in the HLT step as well to have the correct era/conditions for 2022 WFs starting from 139.001