-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SiPixelRawDataError
monitoring for gpuValidation
setup
#41920
Add SiPixelRawDataError
monitoring for gpuValidation
setup
#41920
Conversation
- add comparison histograms - add warning messages, add total FED errors hisogram, add comments on input parametets - add 2D map of GPU/CPU error unbalance vs FEDid / FEDerror type
…onventions in this package
…the gpuValidation modifier is run
test parameters:
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41920/35878
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@nothingface0, @emanueleusai, @cmsbuild, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @tjavaid, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-GPU RelVals-GPUValueError: Undefined workflows: 10824.507 Comparison SummarySummary:
|
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2232eb/33088/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Somewhat inspired by the discussion at #41715 (comment), the main goal of this PR is to add a
DQMEDAnalyzer
(SiPixelPhase1RawDataErrorComparator
) designed to monitor the difference in terms of SiPixel Raw data errors in the CPU and GPU branches of the workflows running thegpuValidation
modifier.As there is no SoA-like data structure used in the CPU workflow (it reads directly the legacy digis) at variance with other heterogeneous data products used in the pixel workflow (recHits, tracks, vertices) I designed the module in order to read the legacy data format
SiPixelRawDataError
(converted from SoA in the GPU workflow and run directly in the CPU one).I profit of this PR to fix a couple of bugs left from the portable data migration PR:
SiPixelCompareRecHitsSoA
(commit d65a81a)SiPixelCompareRecHitsSoA
the convention Host -> CPU and Device -> GPU as used in other plugins of this packagePR validation:
Successfully run the worfklow
runTheMatrix.py -l 10824.507 --command='-n 100'.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, but it might be backported in order to use in the 2023 HLT menus.
Cc:
@sroychow @AdrianoDee