[13.1.X] Add SiPixelRawDataError monitoring for gpuValidation setup

[mmusich]

backport of #41920

PR description:

Somewhat inspired by the discussion at #41715 (comment), the main goal of this PR is to add a DQMEDAnalyzer (SiPixelPhase1RawDataErrorComparator) designed to monitor the difference in terms of SiPixel Raw data errors in the CPU and GPU branches of the workflows running the gpuValidation modifier.
As there is no SoA-like data structure used in the CPU workflow (it reads directly the legacy digis) at variance with other heterogeneous data products used in the pixel workflow (recHits, tracks, vertices) I designed the module in order to read the legacy data format SiPixelRawDataError (converted from SoA in the GPU workflow and run directly in the CPU one).
I profit of this PR to fix a couple of bugs left from the portable data migration PR:

• fix a mistake in one of the input tags in SiPixelCompareRecHitsSoA (commit d65a81a)
• use in SiPixelCompareRecHitsSoA the convention Host -> CPU and Device -> GPU as used in other plugins of this package

PR validation:

Successfully run the worfklow runTheMatrix.py -l 10824.507 --command='-n 100'.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Verbatim intermediate backport #41920 to 13.1.X to be proposed in the 2023 HLT menus.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_13_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

• DQM/SiPixelHeterogeneous (dqm)

@nothingface0, @emanueleusai, @cmsbuild, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @tjavaid, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@idebruyn, @threus, @fioriNTU, @jandrea this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Add SiPixelRawDataError monitoring for gpuValidation setup #41920

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24f509/33118/summary.html
COMMIT: b94af65
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-06-12-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41938/33118/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 6 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3221591
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3221569
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[emanueleusai]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1