update input dataset and fix step

[vlimant]

PR description:

master version of #40184

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40211/33245

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_nano.py modified in PR(s): short names for matrix workflows #40106

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @vlimant (vlimant) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @fabiocos, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @trtomei, @beaucero, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[vlimant]

enable nano

[vlimant]

please test

[AdrianoDee]

+upgrade

[AdrianoDee]

please abort
(at the moment the IB is broken see #40206)

[AdrianoDee]

test parameters:

• pull_request = Fix for TTRHBuilders with PixelCPEFast #40206

[AdrianoDee]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b1678c/29382/summary.html
COMMIT: 7fd70f0
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2022-11-30-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40211/29382/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
1000.0 step 2
1001.0 step 2
10024.0 step 3
10042.0 step 3
101.0 step 1
10224.0 step 3
10824.0 step 3
11634.0 step 3
11634.7 step 3
11634.911 step 3
11634.914 step 3
11834.0 step 3
12434.0 step 3
1306.0 step 3
13234.0 step 2
1330.0 step 3
13434.0 step 2
135.4 step 1
136.731 step 3
136.7611 step 2
136.793 step 3
136.8311 step 2
136.874 step 3
136.88811 step 2
138.4 step 2
138.5 step 2
139.001 step 3
140.53 step 2
140.56 step 2
158.01 step 2
2018.1 step 1
20834.0 step 3
20834.75 step 3
20896.0 step 3
20900.0 step 3
21034.999 step 4
23234.0 step 3
25.0 step 3
2500.601 step 2
250202.181 step 4
25202.0 step 3
312.0 step 3
4.22 step 2
4.53 step 3
5.1 step 1
8.0 step 3
9.0 step 3
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• You potentially added 31976 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0 KiB( 0 files compared)
• Checked 122 log files, 59 edm output root files, 1 DQM output files

NANO Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
2500.311 step 2
2500.312 step 2
2500.31 step 2
2500.331 step 2
2500.332 step 2
2500.33 step 2
2500.401 step 2
2500.4 step 2
2500.501 step 2
2500.511 step 2
2500.51 step 2
2500.5 step 2
2500.601 step 2
2500.6 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• You potentially added 151719 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0 KiB( 0 files compared)
• Checked 17 log files, 0 edm output root files, 1 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.31-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.31-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.311-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.311-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.312-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.312-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.33-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.33-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.331-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.331-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.332-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.332-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.4-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.4-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.401-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.401-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.5-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.5-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.501-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.501-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.51-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.51-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.511-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.511-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.6-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.6-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.601-size.json
• Nano ERROR: Missing ref/2500.601-size.json
• No valid nano workflows found

[vlimant]

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 please sign this in master

[kskovpen]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1

• Bacport PR [12_6_X] update input dataset and fix step #40184 already merged, let merge it also in master