-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Draft] Update HGCAL pset for Phase-2 HLT menu #39450
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39450/32160
|
A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for master. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @AdrianoDee, @bbilin, @cmsbuild, @missirol, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
|
The local test (based on CMSSW_12_6_0_pre2) seems to work fine (I use 39434.75, then modify DIGI-HLT step.) It shows some error message, but did not crash. Error messages that I got, but nothing about
|
Can we disentangle the update of the menu itself from the update of @relval2026? I believe the latter needs much more work as currently the Phase-2 75e33 menu runs in a very special workflow only. |
hold This PR can hold until the L1T transition is done. Thing should be more clear. |
Pull request has been put on hold by @srimanob |
By the way, the issue seems to come between 12_6_0_pre2 and last IB (CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-09-19-2300). Testing this code works with 12_6_0_pre2. Strange that we don't spot it with wf Any idea @cms-sw/l1-l2 ? What are just merged and may cause this? |
Hi @Martin-Grunewald @cecilecaillol The issue in PR test seems to happen only when running step-2 (DIGI-L1Track-L1-HLT@relval2026). If |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39450/32213
|
Pull request #39450 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @civanch, @kskovpen, @missirol, @epalencia, @bbilin, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cecilecaillol, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @mdhildreth, @syuvivida, @sunilUIET, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rekovic, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
Example of HLT Validation from this PR: https://tinyurl.com/2kj6bdub |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9f5e09/27735/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
Looks like we are adding thousands of empty DQM histograms in the wfs in question. The reason, at least in part, is that most of the HLT offline DQM hard-codes the names of Run-3 HLT collections and/or Paths. It's up to DQM to decide, but it looks like a more careful configuration would be needed. |
Hi @missirol Thanks. I noticed that too. Since it effects the phase2 validation sequence, so it adds more empty histograms. |
Regarding the scope of this PR, I thought the plan in #39450 (comment) was sensible (without the DQM updates that add many empty histograms). Of course, the real development will be to (1) update the HLT Phase-2 to avoid any naming clashes with RECO or other steps, and any duplication of modules after this renaming, and (2) add monitoring for the collections in the HLT Phase-2 menu to spot issues like the one in #39323. |
Replace with the new PR #39733 |
PR description:
This PR updates the pset used in Phase-2 HGCAL HLT. The update follows the pset defined in
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/SimCalorimetry/HGCalSimProducers/python/hgcalDigitizer_cfi.py
To complete on PR test, and example of benefit from the new workflow, this PR also introduces
.76
which theDIGI
andHLT:@relval2026
steps are running together instead ofHLT:@fake
. The new workflow will allow us to develop Phase2 HLT DQM and sequence to be used in future Phase-2 production. This PR is an effort to help on validation as mentioned in Add Validation and DQM to Phase2 HLT WF #39362.PR validation:
Run test with updated
39434.76
.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
None.