Move DiMuonMassBiasClient to a regular harvesting path

[mmusich]

PR description:

Inspired by the discussion at #39180 (comment) I move the DiMuonMassBiasClient to a regular harvesting path, actually into the DQMHarvestMuon sequence which as per autoDQM is run in the @muon sequence

cmssw/DQMOffline/Configuration/python/autoDQM.py

Lines 96 to 99 in d9d4aec

	'muon': ['DQMOfflineMuon',
	'PostDQMOffline',
	'DQMHarvestMuon+DQMCertMuon'],

that would be run at Tier-0 for the Muon PD (cf also: https://github.com/dmwm/T0/blob/0f4f9d27c5366da57c456c4ae01da81c75524595/etc/ProdOfflineConfiguration.py#L698)

I profit of this PR to remove remove useless DMQToken produce and consumes as pointed out in #39180 (comment)

PR validation:

Run successfully several workflows that were failing before issue #39180 was solved in threading mode:

runTheMatrix.py -nel 1000.0,10042.0,10842.0 -j 8 -t 4

EDIT:
unfortunately I could not find a RelVal workflow in the matrix that mimics Tier0 in this respect (i.e. that runs ALCA:TkAlDiMuonAndVertex in the same step as DQM and then a regular harvesting, so I've created one for this purpose: 1002.4.

after that I've tested with :

runTheMatrix.py -l 1002.4 -t 4 -j 8 --ibeos

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, but will need to be backported.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39217/31834

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• DQMOffline/Alignment (dqm)
• DQMOffline/Configuration (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

enable threading

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• workflow = 10042.0,10842.0

[mmusich]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39217/31841

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• enable_test = threading
• workflows_threading = 10042.0,10842.0

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #39217 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-31d783/27162/summary.html
COMMIT: 9b3144c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-08-28-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
Additional Tests: THREADING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39217/27162/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-31d783/1002.4_RunDoubleMuon2022B+RunDoubleMuon2022B+TIER0PROMPTRUN3+HARVESTPROMPTRUN3

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3695708
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3695666
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 50 files compared)
• Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[emanueleusai]

+1

[kskovpen]

+pdmv

Thanks Marco

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1

• Wouldn't it be worth adding the newly created 1002.4 workflow into the matrix used regularly for the PR tests, if it really mimics Tier0?

[mmusich]

Wouldn't it be worth adding the newly created 1002.4 workflow into the matrix used regularly for the PR tests, if it really mimics Tier0?

arguably yes, and perhaps we should add also 1001.3 and 1002.3

[srimanob]

Good idea. Currently we have upto 2021 data defined in
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/scripts/runTheMatrix.py