-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12.4.X] Move DiMuonMassBiasClient
to a regular harvesting path
#39248
[12.4.X] Move DiMuonMassBiasClient
to a regular harvesting path
#39248
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_4_X. It involves the following packages:
@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @kskovpen, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_0 had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_110 had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_180 had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOfflineConfiguration_160 had ERRORS and more ... RelValsRelVals-INPUT |
caa6b22
to
1ec6145
Compare
Pull request #39248 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @jfernan2, @kskovpen, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d57ece/27189/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+1 |
+Upgrade Backport PR. |
+pdmv |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@cms-sw/orp-l2 anything that prevents the integration of this PR in 12.4.X? |
@@ -481,6 +481,8 @@ | |||
Run2022B={355130: [[1, 40]]} | |||
steps['RunSingleMuon2022B']={'INPUT':InputInfo(dataSet='/SingleMuon/Run2022B-v1/RAW',label='2022B',events=100000,location='STD', ls=Run2022B)} | |||
steps['RunZeroBias2022B']={'INPUT':InputInfo(dataSet='/ZeroBias/Run2022B-v1/RAW',label='2022B',events=100000,location='STD', ls=Run2022B)} | |||
Run2022B={355680: [[21, 24]]} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was not in #39217: can you add a comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well, it's needed because the PR (#38733) that added them was not backported.
@@ -3167,6 +3169,18 @@ def gen2021HiMix(fragment,howMuch): | |||
'--era' : 'Run2_2018_pp_on_AA', | |||
'--filetype':'DQM', | |||
'-n':100},hiDefaults2018_ppReco]) | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Steps 'HARVESTDRUN3' and 'HARVESTRUN3' were not in #39217: can you add a comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well, it's needed because the PR (#38733) that added them was not backported.
+1
|
backport of #39217
PR description:
Inspired by the discussion at #39180 (comment) I move the
DiMuonMassBiasClient
to a regular harvesting path, actually into theDQMHarvestMuon
sequence which as perautoDQM
is run in the@muon
sequencecmssw/DQMOffline/Configuration/python/autoDQM.py
Lines 96 to 99 in d9d4aec
that would be run at Tier-0 for the
Muon
PD (cf also: https://github.com/dmwm/T0/blob/0f4f9d27c5366da57c456c4ae01da81c75524595/etc/ProdOfflineConfiguration.py#L698)I profit of this PR to remove remove useless DMQToken produce and consumes as pointed out in #39180 (comment)
PR validation:
Run successfully several workflows that were failing before issue #39180 was solved in threading mode:
runTheMatrix.py -nel 1000.0,10042.0,10842.0 -j 8 -t 4
EDIT:
unfortunately I could not find a RelVal workflow in the matrix that mimics Tier0 in this respect (i.e. that runs
ALCA:TkAlDiMuonAndVertex
in the same step as DQM and then a regular harvesting, so I've created one for this purpose: 1002.4.after that I've tested with :
runTheMatrix.py -l 1002.4 -t 4 -j 8 --ibeos
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
backport of #39217 needed for data-taking purposes.