-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix for UBSAN DQM crash #35658
Fix for UBSAN DQM crash #35658
Conversation
As pointed out in: cms-sw#35605 (comment)
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35658/25928
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jfernan2 for master. It involves the following packages:
@jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test workflow 1003.0 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bca6ba/19605/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Wondering if we should just use @allForPrompt which is updated in #35605, instead of this customization? The difference seems to be only egamma, I guess it can run anyways. So we don't need to customize in several places in future. |
I fully agree @srimanob |
please test workflow 1003.0 |
Pull request #35658 was updated. @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen can you please check and sign again. |
Should we abort and start the test again? |
abort |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bca6ba/19681/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+Upgrade Updating DQM and Harvesting sequence of problematic data workflow to allForPrompt. Test runs fine on problematic workflow. |
@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 Any comment? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
As pointed out in:
#35605 (comment)