-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HFNose: ticl updates #33001
HFNose: ticl updates #33001
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33001/21273
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33001/21277
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mariadalfonso for master. It involves the following packages: RecoHGCal/Configuration @perrotta, @civanch, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
filtered_mask = "filteredLayerClustersHFNoseEM:EMn", | ||
seeding_regions = "ticlSeedingGlobalHFNose", | ||
time_layerclusters = "hgcalLayerClustersHFNose:timeLayerCluster", | ||
min_layers_per_trackster = 6 | ||
itername = "EMn", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you use a more expressive name? Also for the downstream HADn
and TrkEMn
.
RecoHGCal/TICL/python/HADStep_cff.py
Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
import FWCore.ParameterSet.Config as cms | |||
|
|||
from RecoHGCal.TICL.TICLSeedingRegions_cff import ticlSeedingGlobal | |||
from RecoHGCal.TICL.TICLSeedingRegions_cff import ticlSeedingGlobal, ticlSeedingGlobalHFNose, ticlSeedingForHFHFNose |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I cannot find where ticlSeedingForHFHFNose
is defined.
Possibly you meant ticlSeedingTrkHFNose
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the test failed because the ticlSeedingForHFHFNose wasn't committed; I did now.
ticlSeedingByHFHFNose allows to seed from a HFcell; but the iteration is not build as would be better to build the trackster outside-in.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for the hadrons I foresee 3 set of iterations:
- early shower for charger particle: track seeded + short trackster
- late shower: HFseeded with outside-in trackster
- all the rest will be taken from the self seeded
@mariadalfonso Out of curiosity, how did you solve the propagation to HFNose business? |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT AddOn
RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...AddOn Tests
Expand to see more addon errors ... |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-547c7c/13506/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Thanks for the updates. Looks like tests run now, no more crash in the validator. There are some HGCAL reco and DQM differences. @mariadalfonso et al, do they look OK to you? |
The few differences on HGCal are related to the particleFlowClusterHGCal. This particleFlowClusterHGCal (likely) depends on the caloParticles change as I suspect the particleFlowClusterHGCal still depend on the sim-assisted reco. |
And any idea why these differences appear only in wf 28234.0 and not in the rest of Phase2 samples? |
yes, the HFnose is only in the WF28234.0 ( as HFnose it's not in the approved Phase2 detector for Run4 ) the phase2_hfnose era activate the caloParticles here |
+1 |
+reconstruction
|
+1 |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
updates only on HFnose, no changes expected on HGCAL