-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update CSCMake2DRecHit.cc #32442
Update CSCMake2DRecHit.cc #32442
Conversation
Fix of issue cms-sw#32274 caused by changes in PR cms-sw#32052
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32442/20333
|
A new Pull Request was created by @nvoytish for master. It involves the following packages: RecoLocalMuon/CSCRecHitD @perrotta, @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test for CMSSW_11_2_ASAN_X |
@smuzaffar is there a way to test with ASAN from the bot? |
@cmsbuild please test for CMSSW_11_3_ASAN_X perhaps this would work |
it works |
-1 CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_ASAN_X_2020-12-09-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: UnitTests RelVals AddOn
I found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMServicesDemo had ERRORS
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows: runTheMatrix-results/11624.911_TTbar_13+2021_DD4hep+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA/step1_TTbar_13+2021_DD4hep+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_GenSim+Digi+Reco+HARVEST+ALCA.log1001.0 step4 runTheMatrix-results/1001.0_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCALRUN1+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4+ALCAHARVD5/step4_RunMinBias2011A+RunMinBias2011A+TIER0EXP+ALCAEXP+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCALRUN1+ALCAHARVD1+ALCAHARVD2+ALCAHARVD3+ALCAHARVD4+ALCAHARVD5.log23234.0 step2 runTheMatrix-results/23234.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal/step2_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal.log28234.0 step2 runTheMatrix-results/28234.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D60+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal/step2_TTbar_14TeV+2026D60+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal.log23434.999 step3 runTheMatrix-results/23434.999_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49PU_PMXS1S2PR+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+PREMIX_PremixHLBeamSpot14PU+DigiTriggerPU+RecoGlobalPU+HARVESTGlobalPU/step3_TTbar_14TeV+2026D49PU_PMXS1S2PR+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+PREMIX_PremixHLBeamSpot14PU+DigiTriggerPU+RecoGlobalPU+HARVESTGlobalPU.log
I found errors in the following addon tests: cmsRun /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week0/slc7_amd64_gcc900/cms/cmssw/CMSSW_11_3_ASAN_X_2020-12-09-2300/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_GRun.py realData=False globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Fri Dec 11 00:54:31 2020-date Fri Dec 11 00:01:05 2020 s - exit: 256 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: |
it doesn't look like the CSC-related error is showing up in the ASAN tests, hopefully it's not shadowed by the other errors |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: |
Comparison results are now available Comparison Summary:
|
@nvoytish |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR required by RECO conveners cms-sw#32442 (comment)
Fix of issue #32274
caused by changes in PR #32052
PR description:
It turned out that we need to keep the omitted "if"
7501f0c#diff-89c0bedb1d5ff71760f4a99102f4c06386cdac66bb8527527d41a7fe28e5dab8L160
We forgot that there is a difference in detid for wires in simulation and real
data. For real data all wires are labelled as ME11B. This "if" does not allow for a strip from ME11A to be assembled with a wire that geometrically is outside the ME11A sensitive area.