-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove phase2_hgcalV9 modifier #30702
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30702/17005
|
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Eras @andrius-k, @schneiml, @ianna, @kpedro88, @rekovic, @fioriNTU, @perrotta, @civanch, @silviodonato, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @mdhildreth, @jfernan2, @slava77, @jpata, @fabiocos, @benkrikler, @kmaeshima, @makortel, @franzoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
@kpedro88 I have a few corrections for dict2026. I shall wait till this PR is integrated. Meanwhile I have corrected the local cfi's for HGCal |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+upgrade |
+1 |
+1 |
Thanks @kpedro88, the L1THGCal changes look fine for me. |
+1 |
l1 signature is missing |
+operations |
@rekovic ? |
merge |
PR description:
After #30645, the
phase2_hgcalV9
modifier and various features to support the old HGCal geometry (which used HCAL for the scintillator part) are no longer needed.This PR removes the modifier and simplifies the associated configuration files. In some cases, the former modifications were set as the default or as part of the base
phase2_hgcal
modifier; in other cases (e.g. tuning/calibrations), the modifications were moved into thephase2_hgcalV10
modifier.If HGCal experts (@cseez @rovere @bsunanda @jbsauvan) would prefer different choices in some of these cases, please comment on this PR.
This PR only addresses configuration files (and associated
fillDescriptions()
). Significant parts of the C++ code could be cleaned up further, but this is left to the existing issue #27095.PR validation:
Ran workflow 23234.0 successfully.