-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Pixel Tracks in Heavy Ions MiniAOD #30313
Add Pixel Tracks in Heavy Ions MiniAOD #30313
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30313/16283
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30313/16296
|
A new Pull Request was created by @CesarBernardes (Cesar Bernardes) for master. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/PatAlgos @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @santocch, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-30313/16820
|
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Dear All,
this PR is made to include Pixel Tracks (dedicated to low-pT tracks 0.3-1.0GeV/c) to Heavy Ions MIniAOD content. So, this is expected to be included only for the eras "pp_on_AA_2018" and "pp_on_PbPb_run3". It includes an EDProducer to create a "packed pixel tracks collection" (similar to "lostTracks" collection) using as input "hiConformalPixelTracks". The studies below was made in 103X, but in 112X we also did the test "runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos", in special workflow 159 that uses these commits.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/sl08rl1xw8a27xi/slides_MiniAOD_PixelTracks_v2.pdf?dl=0
The slides above show some description and comparison of the input collection vs new collection. The quality variables in slide 6 are expected to not match, since we used a less accurate covariance schema to save space. In addition, we added a pt cut of pt<1GeV/c, since in HI analyses using pixel tracks we only consider this pT range.
@mandrenguyen @abaty
Best Regards