-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rebase of #19222: JME python configuration cleanup for 92x #19406
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @rappoccio for master. It involves the following packages: CommonTools/ParticleFlow @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @monttj, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Looking at this, there seem to be some O(10%) differences in soft drop. I will follow up. |
@@ -11,3 +11,25 @@ | |||
rParam = cms.double(0.4) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about turning on "doAreaFastjet=True" for ak4PFJets (and thus all other derived ak jet algorithms) during this cleanup. This is currently done only in the PAT/MiniAOD configuration and lead to many errors in the past.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, will do.
OK I figured out what the remaining problem it. It's actually technically a bug in the previous implementation. The AK8 CHS soft dropped jets were previously only requiring pt > 100 GeV, whereas it was intended to also have a pre-clustering with AK8 that has an |eta| < 2.4 cut. @ahinzmann @jdolen do you two agree with the addition of the |eta| < 2.4 cut and the AK8 preclustering? Our new implementation will slightly speed things up, and fix this "unintended feature". @slava77 is that acceptable? |
On 6/23/17 8:15 AM, rappoccio wrote:
OK I figured out what the remaining problem it. It's actually
technically a bug in the previous implementation. The AK8 CHS soft
dropped jets were previously only requiring pt > 100 GeV, whereas it was
intended to also have a pre-clustering with AK8 that has an |eta| < 2.4 cut.
@ahinzmann <https://github.com/ahinzmann> @jdolen
<https://github.com/jdolen> do you two agree with the addition of the
|eta| < 2.4 cut and the AK8 preclustering?
Our new implementation will slightly speed things up, and fix this
"unintended feature". @slava77 <https://github.com/slava77> is that
acceptable?
with so many changes in code lines, I'd rather decouple refactoring from
physics change.
…
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#19406 (comment)>, or
mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEdcbq6i4FZ9-YrqdPq8FD0mpjuM36wfks5sG9aOgaJpZM4OCdDc>.
|
@slava77 understood. I will retain the old functionality. |
the errors appear to be unrelated to this PR
@Dr15Jones is this a known xrootd failure? |
I can't say that the failure looks familiar. @bbockelm ? |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
merge |
Had a git merge problem that I could not fix in #19222, so re-adding a new PR. Here is the original message:
The JME python configurations had many vestiges left of previous migrations, as well as considerable "top-level" customization that is no longer relevant. I have consolidated the RecoPFJets_cff customizations into separate cfi python files in RecoJets/JetProducers.
Removed iterative cone, SIScone, and AK5 PF and Calo jets in all configurations.
Consolidated the various grooming schemes into a single file per jet radius (so, AK4 puppi is now in ak4PFJets_cfi, for instance).
Left AK4, AK8, KT4, KT6, and only AK5/7 Castor collections since those are the only ones used anywhere in the repository.
Added an example AK8 GenJet configuration with grooming applied, since this is a common question. It is not presently run anywhere, though.
EDIT: No changes should occur to any output, this is a reorganization.