-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow a boost on particles in MCParticlePairFilter #16425
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @echapon (Emilien Chapon) for CMSSW_8_1_X. It involves the following packages: GeneratorInterface/GenFilters @cmsbuild, @govoni, @perrozzi, @thuer, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ | |||
namespace edm { | |||
class HepMCProduct; | |||
} | |||
namespace HepMC { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is not needed given the way that FourVector is used below - you must have included the class definition somewhere else
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry about the late reply. Would it be OK if instead of this declaration I moved the included header https://github.com/echapon/cmssw/blob/bf9d278f552c725aa16496ed0a02029303bc8b4e/GeneratorInterface/GenFilters/src/MCParticlePairFilter.cc#L6 from the .cc to the .h?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi-
class FourVector;
lets you reference pointers to your class. To return a full FourVector you need an include "FourVector.h" (or where-ever the class is defined). So, this header file should work the same without the class FourVector portion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've just tried to remove this part, but then it does not compile... I could also explicitly include the header where this class is define: HepMC/SimpleVector.h
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@davidlange6 sorry for the frequent pings... Could you tell me explicitly how I should change the code?
- removing the "class FourVector;" line is not an option, because it does no longer compile.
- I could instead include "SimDataFormats/GeneratorProducts/interface/HepMCProduct.h" (it is currently in the .cc)
- I could instead include "HepMC/SimpleVector.h"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @echapon - i will try to look tomorrow, something is not right in what you see.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @davidlange6 did you have a chance to have a look?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i just did. don't really understand it. will merge and we see in the future how things progress as compilers change
+1 |
This change is needed to be able to apply generator-level cuts on momenta in the laboratory frame, instead of the centre of mass frame, in the case of boosted MC production (for proton-lead). Note that this is a different strategy than what was used for 5TeV pPb production (for Run1, in 53X), when a customisation swapping the boost and the filter was used instead (https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/CMSSW_5_3_X/GeneratorInterface/HiGenCommon/python/customiseSwapVtxSmearAndProdFilter_cfi.py).
@kurtejung and @mandrenguyen are aware of this pull request.
Let me know if you have any comment on the implementation.