fix: take dummy objects' height into calculation when locating their Z position

[Tier4Guan]

Description

close #3111

fix: take dummy objects' height into calculation when locating their Z position

Related links

Tests performed

Notes for reviewers

Interface changes

Effects on system behavior

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
• The PR has been properly tested.
• The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
• The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[yukkysaito]

Thank you for your PR.
I'll review later 👍

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.03 ⚠️

Comparison is base (1419f32) 14.28% compared to head (f43ef1b) 14.26%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4195      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   14.28%   14.26%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1575     1580       +5     
  Lines      108541   108753     +212     
  Branches    31424    31420       -4     
==========================================
+ Hits        15507    15509       +2     
- Misses      76164    76377     +213     
+ Partials    16870    16867       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	4.21% <0.00%> (?)
total	14.26% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from 6b363dd

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ommon/perception_utils/src/traffic_light_utils.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ation_map_loader/src/elevation_map_loader_node.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...d_map/pointcloud_based_occupancy_grid_map_node.cpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
..._light_occlusion_predictor/occlusion_predictor.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../traffic_light_occlusion_predictor/src/nodelet.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ht_occlusion_predictor/src/occlusion_predictor.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ehavior_path_planner/src/utils/avoidance/utils.cpp	5.79% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
...rivable_area_expansion/drivable_area_expansion.cpp	52.50% <ø> (+0.64%)	⬆️
...er/src/utils/drivable_area_expansion/expansion.cpp	30.55% <ø> (+1.24%)	⬆️
...path_planner/test/test_drivable_area_expansion.cpp	34.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 1 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[yukkysaito]

LGTM
Before

After

[yukkysaito]

LGTM

[yukkysaito]

@Tier4Guan Could you check to pass for CI?

[satoshi-ota]

@yukkysaito Thanks for your review. I ran all CI again.