-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.7.2rc1 #34830
Comments
#34568 Is working as expected |
… On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 7:54 PM Tyler Calder ***@***.***> wrote:
#34568 <#34568> Is working as
expected
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#34830 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADDLAHOCBOWAFK7D2GOHDKTX6VLDLAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5YNKLICVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONJVGUZTIMRRGU>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
#34359 is working as expected. |
#34072 and #34136 work as expected. I also tested a few other PRs:
Details on #34120 issue (cc @hussein-awala)Tested both
In both cases, for different DAGs, I get the error below. #34656 seems to have broken this for me.
|
I don't think the failing one should be considered a blocker since no new issue was introduced. cc @dstandish @hussein-awala |
Yes it should not considered as blocker, but if there is a different blocker for the RC (I hope not), we can cherry-pick #34656 in the next RC |
I tested my changes, they are present in the RC. I tested only the bug fixes, and all looks good, except #34120 as discussed above. |
#34656 is in the release, but not on the release note. You can see the milestone and changelog:skip label on it. I wanted to combine it with #34120 on the release note but forgot that. |
Checked for #34248 and can confirm that (1) code is correctly merged and (2) fix is working! Thanks for making the release! |
Airflow 2.7.2 has been released. Thank you all for testing the release candidate |
#34274 works as expected |
Only verified after release but #34531 is working. |
Body
We are kindly requesting that contributors to Apache Airflow RC 2.7.2rc1 help test the RC.
Please let us know by commenting if the issue is addressed in the latest RC.
Linked issues:
test_xcom_map_error_fails_task
test (#33178)Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
==
byis
for types comparison (#33983): @hussein-awalaLinked issues:
version_added
field in configuration option doesn't work correctly in providers documentation (#34005)pyproject.toml
(#34014): @risicle @TaragolisLinked issues:
pyproject.toml
[project]
section withoutname
andversion
attributes is not pep 621 compliant (#33854)Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
airflow tasks test
(#34109)Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
NOT EXISTS
subquery instead oftuple_not_in_condition
(#33527)Linked issues:
dag_id
+task_id
is too long with OTEL integration enabled. (#34416)Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
Linked issues:
astroid
version < 3 (#34658): @TaragolisSesssionExemptMixin
(#34696): @dkalamarThanks to all who contributed to the release (probably not a complete list!):
@dkalamar @jedcunningham @Raul824 @yiannis-had @Xiroo @erdos2n @drobert-bfm @dstandish @ephraimbuddy @Usiel @potiuk @hussein-awala @eumiro @mbarugelCA @jens-scheffler-bosch @utkarsharma2 @yermalov-here @Taragolis @Abhishek-kumar-samsung @csp33 @pankajkoti @mj-dd @gbonazzoli @fritz-astronomer @sa1 @ldacey @SamWheating @risicle @Calder-Ty @Bisk1 @bolkedebruin @uranusjr @alartum @Jayden-Chiu
Committer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: