Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run App shows incorrect "suggested tip type" during calibration > tip probe #2444

Closed
pantslakz opened this issue Oct 9, 2018 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3644
Closed

Run App shows incorrect "suggested tip type" during calibration > tip probe #2444

pantslakz opened this issue Oct 9, 2018 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3644
Labels
app Affects the `app` project feature Ticket is a feature request / PR introduces a feature

Comments

@pantslakz
Copy link

pantslakz commented Oct 9, 2018

As a Run App user, I would like to be instructed to use the same tip for tip probe and protocol run.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Before tip probe, user is told to add a tip to their pipette
  • Tip type should be the same as whatever they're using in the protocol on that pipette

Copy

  • TBD

Implementation Notes

  • Note tip length is currently a property of the pipette (will eventually be a property of tip rack)
@pantslakz pantslakz added bug app Affects the `app` project labels Oct 9, 2018
@umbhau umbhau added feature Ticket is a feature request / PR introduces a feature and removed bug labels Oct 10, 2018
@mcous
Copy link
Contributor

mcous commented Oct 10, 2018

Note tip length is currently a property of the pipette (will eventually be a property of tip rack)

I don't think tip length enters into this, because the API separates that information from tip type. (In fact, if I understand the state of things correctly, the API doesn't really have a concept of tip types at all).

What we do have, however, is a list of one or more tiprack types that the user has indicated they will use with a given pipette in the protocol:

rack1 = labware.load('opentrons-tiprack-300ul', '1')
rack2 = labware.load('opentrons-tiprack-300ul', '2')
p300 = instruments.P300_Single(mount="left", tip_racks=[rack1, rack2])

So, questions for @pantslakz and @umbhau:

  1. Is it acceptable to try to parse the tip type from the labware type
    • From the name because, as mentioned above, the API doesn't really have a concept of tips
    • If we parse from type, we need to deal with the possibility that we are unable to parse a type
  2. If the user attaches more than one tiprack to a pipette, which one do we select for (1)?

Ping @btmorr in case I'm missing something about how pipettes and labware are currently working.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
app Affects the `app` project feature Ticket is a feature request / PR introduces a feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants