-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
[1LP][RFR][NOTEST]Vm name enhancement #9850
Conversation
c5e243e
to
efac4e0
Compare
efac4e0
to
6bdb1ba
Compare
I detected some fixture changes in commit 6bdb1ba The local fixture
The local fixture
Please, consider creating a PRT run to make sure your fixture changes do not break existing usage 😃 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM :)
policy = appliance.collections.policies.create( | ||
VMControlPolicy, | ||
fauxfactory.gen_alpha(15, start="policy_"), | ||
scope="fill_field(VM and Instance : Name, INCLUDES, {})".format(new_vm.name), | ||
scope="fill_field(VM and Instance : Name, INCLUDES, {})".format(create_vm.name), | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
optional: I would have used fstring here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not seeing any test failures related to the changes here in the Jenkins run, so LGTM 👍
@john-dupuy agree |
Purpose or Intent
create_vm
fixture.NO PRT RUN. Will run in Jenkins.