Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checking different safety properties in different locations #473

Closed
schillic opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Checking different safety properties in different locations #473

schillic opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@schillic
Copy link
Member

schillic commented Feb 19, 2019

Related: #447
In the hybrid setting, instead of checking the same safety property in all locations, we should support a mapping from locations to a property. Note that, in general, this map may be partial, i.e., not every location needs to have a property assigned.
As input, we would then support such a mapping. Additionally, we should still accept a single property and internally convert it to the map that maps all locations to this property.

@schillic schillic self-assigned this Feb 20, 2019
schillic added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2019
#473 - Checking different safety properties in different locations
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant