Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#473 - Checking different safety properties in different locations #480

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 21, 2019

Conversation

schillic
Copy link
Member

Closes #473.

This PR will also implement the poorman's version of #447: Just compute the (concrete) reachable states and check the property afterward.

@schillic schillic changed the title WIP #473 - Checking different safety properties in different locations #473 - Checking different safety properties in different locations Feb 21, 2019
@schillic schillic requested a review from mforets February 21, 2019 09:18
@schillic schillic changed the title #473 - Checking different safety properties in different locations WIP #473 - Checking different safety properties in different locations Feb 21, 2019
@schillic
Copy link
Member Author

schillic commented Feb 21, 2019

The Platooning benchmark reports a violation immediately. I would like to play around with that first before merging here.
EDIT: Done.

@schillic schillic removed the request for review from mforets February 21, 2019 10:15
@schillic schillic requested a review from mforets February 21, 2019 10:22
@schillic schillic changed the title WIP #473 - Checking different safety properties in different locations #473 - Checking different safety properties in different locations Feb 21, 2019
Copy link
Member

@mforets mforets left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@schillic schillic merged commit 17a4015 into master Feb 21, 2019
@schillic schillic deleted the schillic/447 branch February 21, 2019 12:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants