Tcp layers tutorial

[gpucce]

PR Checklist

If you are contributing to Javis.jl, please make sure you are able to check off each item on this list:

• Did I update CHANGELOG.md with whatever changes/features I added with this PR?
• Did I make sure to only change the part of the file where I introduced a new change/feature?
• Did I cover all corner cases to be close to 100% test coverage (if applicable)?
• Did I properly add Javis dependencies to the Project.toml + set an upper bound of the dependency (if applicable)?
• Did I properly add test dependencies to the test directory (if applicable)?
• Did I check relevant tutorials that may be affected by changes in this PR?
• Did I clearly articulate why this PR was made the way it was and how it was made?

Link to relevant issue(s)
Closes #379

How did you address these issues with this PR? What methods did you use?
I followed the outline as closely as I understood it

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #414 (95ae767) into tcp-layers-tutorial (c7c7a9d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           tcp-layers-tutorial     #414   +/-   ##
====================================================
  Coverage                96.25%   96.25%           
====================================================
  Files                       35       35           
  Lines                     1521     1521           
====================================================
  Hits                      1464     1464           
  Misses                      57       57           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c7c7a9d...95ae767. Read the comment docs.

[Wikunia]

Thanks @gpucce We're currently working through it on Twitch 😉
https://www.twitch.tv/thecedarprince

[Sov-trotter]

Just a suggestion. Can we have convenience methods rather than the anonymous functions ?

[gpucce]

sure, you mean the one inside the dancing_circles functions?

[gpucce]

Will do later today