#607 Add minimum and maximum record length option.

[yruslan]

This could help filtering out incorrect records, especially from ASCII files.

[github-actions]

JaCoCo code coverage report - scala 2.11.12 - spark 2.4.8

File	Coverage [63.29%]	❌
CobolScanners.scala	96.38%	🍏
SparkCobolOptionsBuilder.scala	87.21%	🍏
CobolParametersParser.scala	79.67%	❌
FixedLenTextReader.scala	18.62%	❌
FixedLenNestedReader.scala	16.74%	❌
VRLRecordReader.scala	0%	❌

Total Project Coverage	71.39%	🍏

[github-actions]

JaCoCo code coverage report - scala 2.13.10 - spark 3.3.2

File	Coverage [33.39%]	❌
CobolScanners.scala	94.2%	🍏
SparkCobolOptionsBuilder.scala	90.09%	🍏
CobolParametersParser.scala	78.3%	❌
FixedLenTextReader.scala	17.71%	❌
FixedLenNestedReader.scala	14.91%	❌
ReaderParameters.scala	0%	❌
CobolParameters.scala	0%	❌
VRLRecordReader.scala	0%	❌

Total Project Coverage	66.1%	🍏

[github-actions]

JaCoCo code coverage report - scala 2.12.17 - spark 3.2.3

File	Coverage [63.99%]	❌
CobolScanners.scala	94.59%	🍏
SparkCobolOptionsBuilder.scala	89.12%	🍏
CobolParametersParser.scala	78.97%	❌
VRLRecordReader.scala	45.7%	❌
FixedLenTextReader.scala	19.35%	❌
FixedLenNestedReader.scala	16.46%	❌

Total Project Coverage	76.47%	🍏

[yruslan]

Due to historical reasons when 'cobol-parser' and 'spark-cobol' were in a single module most tests are integration tests. After the split tests for 'cobol-parser' remained in 'spark-cobol' which affects coverage reports.

Here is the consolidated report from IntelliJ IDEA:

Admin merging this issue now. The Jacoco plugin will be adjusted according to the historical project structure in a future PR.