-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(perm-checker): rename filter clause to where #1413
Conversation
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@ymc9 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent updates primarily involve renaming the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/enhance/checker-type-generator.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/checker.test.ts (20 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (23)
packages/schema/src/plugins/enhancer/enhance/checker-type-generator.ts (1)
34-34
: Renamingfilter
towhere
in the function signature aligns with the PR's objective to standardize naming conventions.tests/integration/tests/enhancements/with-policy/checker.test.ts (20)
51-51
: Updated test case to usewhere
instead offilter
, aligning with the new naming convention.
66-66
: Correctly updated the test case to reflect the renaming fromfilter
towhere
.
82-84
: All test cases in this block correctly usewhere
in place offilter
.
100-102
: The test cases correctly reflect the renaming and are consistent with the updated naming convention.
121-135
: All test cases in this block have been updated to usewhere
correctly.
151-152
: The boolean field test cases correctly use thewhere
argument.
171-184
: All test cases in this block correctly usewhere
in place offilter
.
200-201
: The string field condition test cases correctly use thewhere
argument.
266-270
: The function and relation test cases correctly usewhere
in place offilter
.
295-295
: Correctly updated the test case to usewhere
instead offilter
.
322-322
: The collection predicate test case correctly useswhere
in place offilter
.
343-357
: All test cases in this block correctly usewhere
in place offilter
.
374-377
: The field condition test cases correctly use thewhere
argument.
438-454
: The auth compared with relation field test cases correctly usewhere
in place offilter
.
530-532
: The nullable field test cases correctly use thewhere
argument.
556-556
: The compilation test case correctly useswhere
in place offilter
.
586-601
: The invalid filter test cases correctly usewhere
in place offilter
.
618-618
: The float field ignored test case correctly useswhere
in place offilter
.
633-634
: The float value ignored test cases correctly usewhere
in place offilter
.
649-650
: The negative value ignored test cases correctly usewhere
in place offilter
.packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts (2)
44-44
: Renamingfilter
towhere
inPermissionCheckArgs
aligns with the PR's objective and improves consistency in naming conventions.
1469-1473
: Ensure that the handling ofwhere
conditions indoCheck
method is robust and correctly implements the intended logic.Verification successful
The
doCheck
method, which includes the handling ofwhere
conditions, is correctly implemented in the filepackages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts
. The code snippet provided in the review comment shows a robust implementation wherewhere
conditions are transformed into constraints, aligning with the intended logic of filtering based on specified conditions.
- File:
packages/runtime/src/enhancements/policy/handler.ts
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct handling of `where` conditions in `doCheck` method. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Correct implementation of logic handling `where`. rg --type typescript $'doCheck'Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the correct handling of `where` conditions in `doCheck` method by searching for its usage. # Correcting the previous script error by omitting the file type specifier rg 'doCheck' --files-with-matchesLength of output: 85
No description provided.