This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2020. It is now read-only.
initial fix for having emitters on objects #51
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e as it test wether the received emitter is a string or a list I'd rather have just lists, there's no need for backwards compatibility yet. OTOH we're still discussing the capability organisation
|
Now I'm continuing I think it would be smarter to put some effort into getting emitter indexes. That would make this way easier |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix for #50: it is backwards compatible as it test wether the received emitter is a string or a list
I'd rather have just lists, there's no need for backwards compatibility yet. OTOH we're still discussing the capability organisation