Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(mls): unify MLS client identity models (WPB-9774) #3107

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

mchenani
Copy link
Contributor

@mchenani mchenani commented Jun 18, 2024

BugWPB-9774 Refactoring MLS Client Identity models


PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

  • The PR Title

    • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
    • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
    • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³
  • The PR Description

    • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

What's new in this PR?

To fetch the MLSClientIdentity from CC we were mapping them in different models, due to different changes we needed more data to be exposed, we needed them to be unified and map all the available data from CC.

Issues

Hard to maintain different models
Due to maturity of CC now we have a rich and solid model we can map full object in Kalium and Android App.

Needs releases with:

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

  • I have added automated test to this contribution

How to Test

We need to test all E2EI features on this PR

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

  • Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

  • If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

References
  1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
  2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
  3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 18, 2024

Test Results

857 tests   857 ✅  8m 13s ⏱️
117 suites    0 💤
117 files      0 ❌

Results for commit 15dedbf.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@mchenani mchenani changed the title Fix/unify mls client identity models Fix/unify mls client identity models (WPB-9774) Jun 20, 2024
@mchenani mchenani marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2024 11:32
@mchenani mchenani changed the title Fix/unify mls client identity models (WPB-9774) chore(mls): unify MLS client identity models (WPB-9774) Jun 26, 2024
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/M and removed size/S labels Jul 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

APKs built during tests are available here. Scroll down to Artifacts!

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

APKs built during tests are available here. Scroll down to Artifacts!

@mchenani mchenani merged commit e8fd207 into release/cycle-4.6 Jul 18, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
@mchenani mchenani deleted the fix/unify-mls-client-identity-models branch July 18, 2024 12:38
@echoes-hq echoes-hq bot added the echoes: technical-roadmap/technical-debt More specific category, to highlight Technical Debt being tackled. label Jul 18, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
)

Signed-off-by: alexandreferris <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mojtaba Chenani <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: alexandreferris <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yamil Medina <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
echoes: technical-roadmap/technical-debt More specific category, to highlight Technical Debt being tackled. size/M
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants