Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

if the server is booting when OnlineManagementClient connects, it should wait until it's running #43

Closed
Ladicek opened this issue Dec 18, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

if the server is booting when OnlineManagementClient connects, it should wait until it's running #43

Ladicek opened this issue Dec 18, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Ladicek
Milestone
1.1.0

Comments

@Ladicek
Copy link
Contributor

Ladicek commented Dec 18, 2015

It's possible for ManagementClient.online(...) to end up with an exception like this: java.lang.AssertionError: Expected success, but operation failed: {"outcome" => "failed","failure-description" => "WFLYCTL0379: System boot is in process; execution of remote management operations is not currently available"}

This is caused by the client trying to perform a management operation while the server is still booting. The client should detect this situation and wait until the server is running (using some reasonable timeout, e.g. 20 seconds).
@Ladicek Ladicek self-assigned this Dec 18, 2015
@Ladicek
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ladicek commented Dec 18, 2015

The timeout should be configurable in OnlineOptions.

@Ladicek Ladicek added this to the 1.1.0 milestone Apr 25, 2016
@Ladicek Ladicek mentioned this issue Apr 25, 2016
Merged
@Ladicek Ladicek mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2016
Closed
@Ladicek Ladicek mentioned this issue May 10, 2016
Closed
jtymel added a commit to jtymel/creaper that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2016
@jtymel
Merge pull request wildfly-extras#43 from jtymel/new-commands-dr8
f3465e1 
Add commands for identity-realm and constant-realm-mapper
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Ladicek Ladicek

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.1.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Ladicek