Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency when using "Rethrow any exceptions" #209

Closed
ArkadiuszMichalski opened this issue Apr 8, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Inconsistency when using "Rethrow any exceptions" #209

ArkadiuszMichalski opened this issue Apr 8, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@ArkadiuszMichalski
Copy link
Contributor

What is convenction when we have nested algorithms and some of them throws exception, this exception should be always rethrows in the calling algorithm (and marking it in prose)? Now it's unclear, especially for node mutations.
Some analysis:

https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-element-insertadjacentelement
insertAdjacentElement(where, element) (rethrow for "insert-adjacent") > "insert-adjacent" (rethrow for "pre-insert") > "pre-insert" (not rethrow for "ensure pre-insertion validity") > "ensure pre-insertion validity" (throw)
"
https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-node-appendchild
appendChild(node) (not rethrow for "append") > "append" (not rethrow for "pre-insert") > "pre-insert" (not rethrow for "ensure pre-insertion validity") > "ensure pre-insertion validity" (throw)

https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-node-replacechild
replaceChild(node, child) (not rethrow for "replace") > "replace" (throw)

Only three examples, but there are more, not olny for nodes, at once hard to locate all of them.

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Apr 8, 2016

The preference is to call it out since it's not always obvious what should be done to implementers. And sometimes we don't rethrow the exception, but report it instead (event dispatch for instance).

Hopefully longer term we have some ECMAScript-inspired formalism in IDL we can use, but until that time this is what we got.

annevk added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 16, 2016
Fixes #224 and part of #212. Also fix part of #209 by stating these
algorithms can rethrow exceptions.
tabatkins added a commit to tabatkins/dom that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2016
* Add more legacy event types for createEvent()

Approximately as requested at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1251198#c7. This is the
list of events supported in createEvent() by at least two of Firefox,
Chrome, and IE 11. The one exception is I omitted MutationEvent,
which all three support, because apparently spec-land has decided to
deny its existence in the hope that it will go away.

Bikeshed does not know about all of the added interface names,
hopefully that will sort itself out over time.

* Meta: improve pull request instructions for DOM

See whatwg/fetch#276 for context.

* Enable an event listener to be invoked just once

* Editorial: web compatibility typically remains relevant

Fixes whatwg#210.

* Shadow: define attachShadow() for custom elements

* Meta: make it easier to reference participate in a tree

PR: whatwg#216

* Define node document for new Text nodes

Fixes whatwg#224 and part of whatwg#212. Also fix part of whatwg#209 by stating these
algorithms can rethrow exceptions.

* Use a single concept for attribute changes

This setup is still a little sketchy I think, but not more so than the
insertion and removing steps.

* SVGEvent is only Gecko, Blink also has SVGEvents

As pointed out by zcorpan in whatwg#227.

* Set createDocument()'s content type based on namespace

Fixes whatwg#217.

PR: whatwg#218

* Make document.createEvent("touchevent") sometimes throw

Browsers typically disable touch events on non-touch devices, and there exists web content that detects this difference using document.createEvent().

Fixes whatwg#227.

* Shadow: define slotchange event

Shadow: define slotchange event

Fixes WICG/webcomponents#288.

This defines the slotchange event in response to remove/insert operations, changes to a slot’s name attribute, and changes to an element’s slot attribute.

This also introduces the assigned nodes concept for slots, and assigned slot concept for slotables.

Slotables now also have a name, rather than a “get name”.

The slotchange event dispatches just after mutation observers have their callbacks invoked. The slotchange event is not yet marked scoped as scoped events are not yet defined in the DOM Standard.

Note: although the original issue did not mention it, this also suppresses signaling when slots are removed from a tree. Not just when they are inserted.

* Editorial: update custom element cross-spec references

* Editorial: fix a few cross-linking missteps

* Editorial: make "is" and "prefix" optional in "create an element"

* Use "create an element" in createHTMLDocument

Takes care of part of whatwg#212.

* Editorial: align exception language with IDL

* Editorial: introduce more shadow-including terms for CSS

Fixes whatwg#225.

* Editorial: distributed -> flattened

* Meta: export more terms

Fixes whatwg#233.

* Editorial: add "shadow host" and "assigned" as terms

This makes a couple of non-null checks read better and enshrines a term
we had already been using.

* Editorial: flip non-null/otherwise conditions

PR: whatwg#234

* Shadow: <slot> is now defined in HTML

* Remove passive as event listener key

This changes makes passive no longer contribute to the uniqueness of
an event listener. It therefore also no longer needs to be supported
as part of removeEventListener().

Fixes WICG/EventListenerOptions#27.

PR: whatwg#236

* Meta: point out event's timeStamp is likely to change

See whatwg#23 for details.

* Add [CEReactions] annotations to mutating methods

Part of WICG/webcomponents#186, and furthering whatwg/html@27aa7bc.

Linking [CEREactions] will happen once speced/bikeshed#677 is fixed.

* Editorial: check stop propagation flag at start of invoke

* Editorial: deduplicate Veli Şenol

* Editorial: define defaults for EventListenerOptions

Although this is also done in prose, this nonetheless simplifies the
prose a bit and makes it clearer to those skimming the standard what is
going on (although skimming is not recommended).

Fixes whatwg#239.

* Meta: link to Japanese translation

See
triple-underscore/triple-underscore.github.io#1
for more details.
annevk added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2017
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Mar 16, 2017

I posted a PR to fix at least these. Review welcome. If you find more I'm happy to take PRs from you or new issues.

@annevk annevk closed this as completed in d298c5b Mar 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants