Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes process-by-name layout with ./foo and /foo nodes #948

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 10, 2016

Conversation

foot
Copy link
Contributor

@foot foot commented Feb 9, 2016

lodash (used by dagre) was in effect mixing up these ids.

fixes #947

lodash (used by dagre) was in effect mixing up these ids.
@foot
Copy link
Contributor Author

foot commented Feb 9, 2016

This is not a super fun PR to review.

It introduces another layer of node id munging to fix the _.has problem mentioned in the issue.

Longterm fix would be to try and get something push back into dagre perhaps.

@davkal
Copy link
Contributor

davkal commented Feb 9, 2016

LGTM

I guess _.has is the same logic tha enables your favorite _.get 😄

@foot
Copy link
Contributor Author

foot commented Feb 10, 2016

Hahah, yes, I think lodash should drop the string version of path. Explicit lists for the win.

foot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2016
Fixes process-by-name layout with ./foo and /foo nodes
@foot foot merged commit 8ba5a05 into master Feb 10, 2016
@foot foot deleted the 947-fixes-process-by-name-layout branch February 22, 2016 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Empty 'processes by name' view
2 participants