Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix #457 #734] ACC-008 landmarks issues #735

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 13, 2017
Merged

Conversation

tofi86
Copy link
Collaborator

@tofi86 tofi86 commented Jan 1, 2017

This is a bunch of commits to solve #457 and #734 (issues with ACC-008 and landmarks in general).

I split this into 4 commits to make clearer what has been changed, but this can be squashed in the end...

There has been a typo "landmark" instead of "landmarks" and problems with retrieving attributes with namespaces.

Also moved the landmarks check from ctc/EpubHTML5StructureCheck.java to ctc/EpubNavCheck.java to be able to report the proper NAV file instead of an empty context.
This lead to the discovery of #734.

Fixed that and changed 73 test files for ACC-008.

@tofi86 tofi86 added the type: bug The issue describes a bug label Jan 1, 2017
@tofi86 tofi86 added this to the Next milestone Jan 1, 2017
@tofi86 tofi86 self-assigned this Jan 1, 2017
@tofi86 tofi86 requested a review from rdeltour January 1, 2017 11:00
@tofi86 tofi86 changed the title Fix #457 #734 ACC-008 landmarks issues [fix #457 #734] ACC-008 landmarks issues Jun 2, 2017
@tofi86 tofi86 added bugfix and removed type: bug The issue describes a bug labels Jun 2, 2017
Copy link
Member

@rdeltour rdeltour left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@rdeltour rdeltour merged commit 74d0bdd into master Jun 13, 2017
@rdeltour rdeltour deleted the fix-ACC008_landmarks branch June 13, 2017 00:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants