Fixes treeSelection filtering of samples in group #5227
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-400: Consider performance optimizations for large datasetsThe tree selection component handles complex state management with nested structures. With the addition of indeterminate state filtering, consider these optimizations:
- Memoize the filtered selectedSampleIds calculation using useMemo to prevent unnecessary recalculations
- Consider using a Set for faster lookups when checking indeterminate states
- Add performance testing for large datasets to ensure the filtering doesn't impact responsiveness
Would you like help implementing these optimizations?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx (1)
180-181: Verify the filtering logic for indeterminate states
The addition of the indeterminate state check aligns with the PR objective to fix group filtering. However, let's verify the behavior in edge cases:
- The condition
!Object.keys(updatedState[key])?.includes("indeterminate")uses optional chaining, butupdatedState[key]is guaranteed to exist here, making it unnecessary. - The check for indeterminate state could be simplified to directly access the property.
Consider simplifying the condition:
- !Object.keys(updatedState[key])?.includes("indeterminate");
+ !updatedState[key].indeterminate;Let's verify the impact of this change on group selection behavior:
✅ Verification successful
The optional chaining in the indeterminate check is unnecessary and can be simplified
Based on the codebase analysis, I can confirm that:
- The
updatedState[key]object always exists and contains a structured state withcheckedand optionalindeterminateproperties. - The indeterminate state is consistently managed throughout the component, being explicitly set to
falseor used in parent node calculations. - The suggested simplification is safe as the state object is guaranteed to exist at this point.
Recommended change:
- !Object.keys(updatedState[key])?.includes("indeterminate");
+ !updatedState[key].indeterminate;This change will:
- Make the code more concise and easier to read
- Maintain the same functionality as the original code
- Be more performant by avoiding unnecessary object key enumeration
- Match the pattern used elsewhere in the codebase for checking indeterminate state
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances where indeterminate state is handled
rg -n "indeterminate.*state|state.*indeterminate" --type ts
# Look for related test files
fd "TreeSelectionView.test" --type file
Length of output: 551
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the state object structure and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'state: {
$$$
}'
# Look for checkbox state type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
indeterminate?: $_
$$$
}'
# Search for state updates related to indeterminate
rg -n -A 2 -B 2 "state\[.*\].*=.*{.*indeterminate" --type ts
Length of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the state handling in TreeSelectionView
rg -n "state\[.+\]\s*=" --type ts
# Look for the type definition of the state object
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = {
$$$
indeterminate: $_
$$$
}'
# Check how updatedState is used in the component
rg -n -A 2 -B 2 "updatedState\[.+\]" --type ts
Length of output: 10606
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
How is this patch tested? If it is not, please explain why.
(Details)
Release Notes
Is this a user-facing change that should be mentioned in the release notes?
notes for FiftyOne users.
(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description
if this PR is part of a larger change.)
What areas of FiftyOne does this PR affect?
fiftyonePython library changesSummary by CodeRabbit