Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix: clean treeselectionview type and fix a initial state check grid samples issue #5053

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

lanzhenw
Copy link
Contributor

@lanzhenw lanzhenw commented Nov 6, 2024

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

clean up and added initial state to select samples from the grid

How is this patch tested? If it is not, please explain why.

(Details)

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change that should be mentioned in the release notes?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release
    notes for FiftyOne users.

(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description
if this PR is part of a larger change.)

What areas of FiftyOne does this PR affect?

  • App: FiftyOne application changes
  • Build: Build and test infrastructure changes
  • Core: Core fiftyone Python library changes
  • Documentation: FiftyOne documentation changes
  • Other

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced TreeSelectionView component with improved checkbox functionality for selecting all items and managing tree node states.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated method signature in the Object class for more flexible parameter handling in the tree method.
  • Documentation

    • Clarified usage of the tree method with keyword arguments for better understanding.

@lanzhenw lanzhenw requested a review from a team November 6, 2024 18:53
@lanzhenw lanzhenw self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the TreeSelectionView component in TreeSelectionView.tsx, including the addition of an unbound state using useUnboundState and updates to state management logic for checkboxes and tree nodes. Additionally, the tree method in the Object class of fiftyone/operators/types.py has been updated to accept keyword arguments instead of variable items, reflecting a shift towards a more structured parameter handling approach.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx Added useUnboundState import, modified state management for checkboxes, and implemented recursive state updates for tree nodes.
fiftyone/operators/types.py Updated tree method signature to accept keyword arguments (**kwargs) instead of variable items (*items), and changed instantiation of tree_type to a List of String types.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug, app, plugins

Suggested reviewers

  • imanjra
  • manivoxel51
  • Br2850

🐰 In the trees where the bunnies play,
New states hop in without delay.
Checkboxes dance, and nodes expand,
A joyful change across the land!
With every click, the trees align,
In code we trust, all will be fine! 🌳✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ea3e04 and 8cf5375.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx (2)

6-6: Skip comment - issue already addressed

A previous review comment already flagged the unused unboundState issue.

Also applies to: 74-75


198-206: ⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Fix duplicate initialization and effect dependencies

The useEffect has several critical issues:

  1. Duplicates initialization logic from the early return block
  2. Missing dependencies could cause stale closures
  3. Unconditional state update could override user selections

Apply this fix to resolve the issues:

- useEffect(() => {
-   const sampleIds = view?.data.flatMap(([parentId, children]) => {
-     return children.map((childId) =>
-       typeof childId === "string" ? childId : childId[0]
-     );
-   });
-   onChange(path, sampleIds);
-   // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
- }, []);

+ // Move initialization to a single location in the early return
+ if (data === undefined && view?.data) {
+   const sampleIds = view.data.flatMap(([parentId, children]) => {
+     return children.map((childId) =>
+       typeof childId === "string" ? childId : childId[0]
+     );
+   });
+   onChange(path, sampleIds);
+   return null;
+ }

This change:

  1. Eliminates the race condition
  2. Ensures initialization happens only when needed
  3. Prevents unnecessary re-renders
  4. Maintains consistent state management

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@@ -70,6 +71,13 @@ export default function TreeSelectionView(props: ViewPropsType) {
const [checkedState, setCheckedState] =
React.useState<CheckedState>(initialCheckedState);

const unboundState = useUnboundState(checkedState);

// useEffect(() => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you are confident this useEffect is no longer needed, you can probably just delete it @lanzhenw - it looks like it is just a console.log() anyway

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed.

Copy link
Contributor

@Br2850 Br2850 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏽 see comment about removing commented out code

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
fiftyone/operators/types.py (1)

613-618: Update the docstring to include **kwargs parameter

The docstring for the tree method does not document the **kwargs parameter. Including **kwargs in the docstring will provide clarity on the additional arguments that can be passed to the method.

Apply this diff to update the docstring:

 def tree(self, name, **kwargs):
     """Defines a tree property on the object.
 
     Args:
         name: the name of the property
+        **kwargs: additional keyword arguments for the tree view and property
 
     Returns:
         a :class:`Tree`
     """
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3331aa0 and 5ea3e04.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx (3 hunks)
  • fiftyone/operators/types.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/TreeSelectionView.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
fiftyone/operators/types.py (1)

613-623: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure all calls to tree method are updated to match the new signature

The tree method signature has changed from accepting *items to only **kwargs. This modification may break existing code where tree is called with positional arguments. Please verify that all usages of tree in the codebase have been updated to match the new signature.

Run the following script to identify any calls to tree that may need updating:

Comment on lines 74 to 80
const unboundState = useUnboundState(checkedState);

// useEffect(() => {
// console.log('unboundState useEffect', unboundState)
// // no need to call onChange here, because the change comes from python side
// }, [data, unboundState])

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unused unboundState or document its purpose

The unboundState is created but never used in the component. The commented useEffect suggests it's related to Python-side synchronization, but its purpose isn't clear. This could lead to unnecessary re-renders and memory allocation.

Either:

  1. Remove the unused state:
-  const unboundState = useUnboundState(checkedState);
-
-  // useEffect(() => {
-  //   console.log('unboundState useEffect', unboundState)
-  //   // no need to call onChange here, because the change comes from python side
-  // }, [data, unboundState])
  1. Or document its purpose and implement the intended functionality.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const unboundState = useUnboundState(checkedState);
// useEffect(() => {
// console.log('unboundState useEffect', unboundState)
// // no need to call onChange here, because the change comes from python side
// }, [data, unboundState])

Comment on lines +203 to +211
useEffect(() => {
const sampleIds = view?.data.flatMap(([parentId, children]) => {
return children.map((childId) =>
typeof childId === "string" ? childId : childId[0]
);
});
onChange(path, sampleIds);
// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
}, []);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Refactor duplicate initialization logic and fix effect dependencies

The useEffect duplicates the initialization logic from the early return block and has several issues:

  1. Potential race condition with the early return logic
  2. Missing dependencies in the effect's dependency array
  3. Unconditional state update on mount

Consider refactoring to:

- useEffect(() => {
-   const sampleIds = view?.data.flatMap(([parentId, children]) => {
-     return children.map((childId) =>
-       typeof childId === "string" ? childId : childId[0]
-     );
-   });
-   onChange(path, sampleIds);
-   // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
- }, []);

+ useEffect(() => {
+   if (data === undefined && view?.data) {
+     const sampleIds = view.data.flatMap(([parentId, children]) => {
+       return children.map((childId) =>
+         typeof childId === "string" ? childId : childId[0]
+       );
+     });
+     onChange(path, sampleIds);
+   }
+ }, [data, view?.data, path, onChange]);

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@lanzhenw lanzhenw enabled auto-merge (squash) November 6, 2024 18:59
@lanzhenw lanzhenw merged commit f1c69dd into develop Nov 6, 2024
12 checks passed
@lanzhenw lanzhenw deleted the nodeTreeView branch November 6, 2024 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants