-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gen4: improvement of joinTree
creation
#8822
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
…ensure dependencies Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
@frouioui the sizegen test is failing. I tried running |
Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <[email protected]>
GuptaManan100
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! 😺
systay
reviewed
Sep 16, 2021
systay
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2021
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
…n4-fix-8813 Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <[email protected]>
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request contains a bug fix for #8813. The bug happens when we join two
queryTree
s to create ajoinTree
.When pushing a join predicate on a
joinTree
(pushJoinPredicate
), we're looking in the predicate for aColName
thatLHS
solves, once we find theColName
, we add it toLHS
'scolumns
, and we add it into ourjoinTree
'sJoinVars
.Then, we create an argument for this new column, along with a new predicate containing the argument and the second column of our join predicate, which is solved by
RHS
. This new predicate is pushed toRHS
using the same functionpushJoinPredicate
.However, if
RHS
is also ajoinTree
we try to push the predicate as an output column, meaning that we will create new output columns inRHS
, and this is done in a recursive fashion (i.e if RHS's RHS is also ajoinTree
). Instead, we can add the predicate to the first route we find inRHS
that solves it, avoiding the creation of unrequired output columns.Related Issue(s)
Checklist