Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v12: Rename V2 to Umbraco.Cms.Imaging.ImageSharp2 #14223

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 11, 2023

Conversation

ronaldbarendse
Copy link
Contributor

@ronaldbarendse ronaldbarendse commented May 9, 2023

As mentioned on #14216 (comment) (and later discussed internally), this now renames the Umbraco.Cms.Imaging.ImageSharp.V2 project to Umbraco.Cms.Imaging.ImageSharp2. The Umbraco.Cms.Imaging.ImageSharp project will then always reference the latest version when releasing a new CMS major.

I've included the major version in the v2 package title/description and renamed the namespace, so you don't have to update any references in your own code when switching from the latest version back to version 2.

@nikolajlauridsen
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @ronaldbarendse, thanks for your interest, I had a chat with Bjarke about it this morning, and we do not want to have the version number in the current ImageSharp version (So no ImageSharp3), our reasoning is that we don't want the confusion of have ImageSharp3, ImageSharp4, etc. And not knowing which is the recommended version,

However ImageSharp.V2 is a particular case because of the licensing change, so that's why it's there, so ImageSharp is default and ImageSharp.V2 is if you want to use the old version

@ronaldbarendse ronaldbarendse changed the title v12: Rename Umbraco.Cms.Imaging.ImageSharp projects/packages v12: Rename V2 to Umbraco.Cms.Imaging.ImageSharp2 May 10, 2023
@bergmania bergmania merged commit b0d19bf into v12/dev May 11, 2023
@bergmania bergmania deleted the v12/feature/imagesharp-project-renames branch May 11, 2023 09:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants