-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unhandled ssa condition #244
Comments
timholy
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 18, 2021
The issue here is a call to hvcat(rows::Tuple{Vararg{Int}}, xs::_DenseConcatGroup...) = Base.typed_hvcat(promote_eltype(xs...), rows, xs...) which has a couple of `Core._apply_iterate` and the matching fails when it doesn't match the trigger `promote_eltype`. I tried to come up with a MWE but failed. Fixes #244
Sorry for the delay. Hopefully this will be fixed by #247. |
timholy
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 18, 2021
The issue here is a call to hvcat(rows::Tuple{Vararg{Int}}, xs::_DenseConcatGroup...) = Base.typed_hvcat(promote_eltype(xs...), rows, xs...) which has a couple of `Core._apply_iterate` and the matching fails when it doesn't match the trigger `promote_eltype`. I tried to come up with a MWE but failed. Fixes #244
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I am trying to fix some compilation related issues in my package DescriptorSystems. After switching to Julia 1.6, the compilation times are much better. I think this can be also seen from the duration of tests with different Julia versions, which are now about 35% faster than with Julia 1.5 and more than 6 times faster compared to earlier versions. Still I wonder if the latency can be further reduced by clever tricks to arrive to better execution times also for earlier versions of Julia (but this is my problem).
In trying several changes, I got the following error message. I included the whole calling sequence (although the example is not reproducible, being produced with my local development version):
Here is a run which shows that the execution has no errors
I wonder if the
6.43% compilation time
above is the right value (see below).The potential for improvements can be seen from the following slightly changed run (replaced
0
withzero(z)
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: