-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[bug] AppImage fails to run due to misguided "validation" #7736
Labels
Comments
probonopd
added
status: needs triage
This issue needs to triage, applied to new issues
type: bug
labels
Sep 2, 2023
This was referenced Sep 15, 2023
This was referenced Sep 15, 2023
As a fix, please reverse-apply https://github.com/tauri-apps/tauri/commit/6fbd6dba5290dc017ab0ba5a44cf4358b022836f.diff |
lucasfernog
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
…nted, closes #7736 (#7843) Co-authored-by: Lucas Nogueira <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lucas Fernandes Nogueira <[email protected]>
lucasfernog
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
…nted, closes #7736 (#7912) Co-authored-by: Benjamin Demetz <[email protected]>
Closed
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Describe the bug
6fbd6db ("validate AppImage execution when env vars are set") introduces a "validation" that makes unreasonable assumptions, and as a result the AppImage does not work as it should:
References:
Reproduction
--appimage-extract
, then run it using./squashfs-root/AppRun
Expected behavior
The application runs.
Platform and versions
Stack trace
Additional context
Nothing in the AppImageSpec suggests or guarantees that an AppImage gets mounted to a mountpoint of any sort of predictable path. Just because one particular version of the AppImage runtime had a certain behavior it cannot be deduced that this is universally true; e.g., when using Firejail it is not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: