-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[doc] Modified some errors in the function examples #7094
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I found this while using ti.math.sign(), the description confused me >>> x = ti.Vector([-1.0, 0.0, 1.0]) >>> ti.sign(x) [0.8, 0.3, 0.3, 0.2] then found more wrong information in mathimpl.py, there exists three writting styles, andI've unified them.
✅ Deploy Preview for docsite-preview ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
welann
changed the title
[doc]Modified some errors in the function examples
[doc] Modified some errors in the function examples
Jan 8, 2023
@neozhaoliang Could you check whether these modifications are correct? If they are correct, the PR should be merged before 1.4.0 releases. |
neozhaoliang
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for these corrections!
lin-hitonami
pushed a commit
to lin-hitonami/taichi
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2023
I found this while using ti.math.sign(), the description confused me >x = ti.Vector([-1.0, 0.0, 1.0]) ti.sign(x) [0.8, 0.3, 0.3, 0.2] then found more wrong information in mathimpl.py, there exists three writting styles, and I've unified them.
lin-hitonami
pushed a commit
to lin-hitonami/taichi
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2023
I found this while using ti.math.sign(), the description confused me >x = ti.Vector([-1.0, 0.0, 1.0]) ti.sign(x) [0.8, 0.3, 0.3, 0.2] then found more wrong information in mathimpl.py, there exists three writting styles, and I've unified them.
quadpixels
pushed a commit
to quadpixels/taichi
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2023
I found this while using ti.math.sign(), the description confused me >x = ti.Vector([-1.0, 0.0, 1.0]) ti.sign(x) [0.8, 0.3, 0.3, 0.2] then found more wrong information in mathimpl.py, there exists three writting styles, and I've unified them.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I found this while using ti.math.sign(), the description confused me
then found more wrong information in mathimpl.py, there exists three writting styles, and I've unified them.