Avoid StringBuilder.append(Object) in ContentDisposition #25056
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The return type of expression
(c == '"' && !escaped) ? "\\\"" : c
isObject
, which implies a call toStringBuilder.append(Object)
.The implementation of the following means that lots of garbage objects are allocated as a result of
String.valueOf()
.Instead of covariant append we can use exact signatures, i.e. one taking
char
and one takingString
which allows us to avoid unnecessary allocations.This benchmark demonstrates significant improvement even for filename of length = 10: