Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to use read_or_list_full #430

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 25, 2023
Merged

Update to use read_or_list_full #430

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 25, 2023

Conversation

jeanconn
Copy link
Contributor

@jeanconn jeanconn commented Sep 21, 2023

Description

Update to use read_or_list_full

Interface impacts

Testing

Tested with ska3-flight 2023.7 from /proj/sot/ska3/test . Also included hopper in PYTHONPATH with sot/hopper#25 .

Unit tests

  • Linux

Independent check of unit tests by [REVIEWER NAME]

  • [PLATFORM]:

Functional tests

Run with HEAD ska3/test + hopper PR 25 at https://icxc.cfa.harvard.edu/aspect/test_review_outputs/starcheck-pr430/sep1823_test.html

Run with HEAD ska3/test installed starcheck and default pythonpath at https://icxc.cfa.harvard.edu/aspect/test_review_outputs/starcheck-pr430/sep1823_2023.7.html

Diff at https://icxc.cfa.harvard.edu/aspect/test_review_outputs/starcheck-pr430/diff.html -- shows no diffs in output. The only diff is the lack of FutureWarnings in the console output.

@jeanconn jeanconn changed the title WIP: Update to use read_or_list_full Update to use read_or_list_full Sep 24, 2023
@jeanconn jeanconn requested a review from taldcroft September 24, 2023 15:42
Copy link
Member

@taldcroft taldcroft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. I like the change to consistent use of obsreqs which is a much better name.

@jeanconn jeanconn merged commit fb0e448 into master Sep 25, 2023
@jeanconn jeanconn deleted the read_or_list branch September 25, 2023 13:10
@javierggt javierggt mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2023
@javierggt javierggt mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants