Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENHANCEMENT: Add nested fields, args, distribute args to fields #683
ENHANCEMENT: Add nested fields, args, distribute args to fields #683
Changes from all commits
0874064
9d65e57
78674c4
8309888
6a302eb
2c4c6a9
9e80ebe
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is that an invalid symbol in GraphQL field names? I mean, it'd be a pretty weird field name, but who knows :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, deliberately so, because the
/
is a DSL for nested field names. Had to choose a character that was invalid.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In terms of API, it feels a bit weird to have "root" as a mandated argument. I would've done the function signature the other way around.
addFields(fields, path?)
, just assumeroot
, and start deeper paths there (foo/bar
rather thanroot/foo/bar
)