Upgrade .NET from 6.0 to 8.0

[imnasnainaec]

Follows #3049, #3050, #3052
Resolves #3043

---

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.14%. Comparing base (8ca63d9) to head (d17beea).

Files	Patch %	Lines
Backend/Services/InviteService.cs	50.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3046      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.98%   75.14%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         273      273              
  Lines       10397    10386      -11     
  Branches     1230     1230              
==========================================
+ Hits         7796     7805       +9     
+ Misses       2241     2223      -18     
+ Partials      360      358       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backend	84.33% <66.66%> (+0.36%)	⬆️
frontend	66.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jasonleenaylor]

docs/user_guide/assets/licenses/backend_licenses.txt line 34 at r1 (raw file):

####################################################################################################
Package:icu.net

? Any thoughts on why this went away?

[jasonleenaylor]

I think there might be one more TryGetValue where we don't use the out value that I missed. Otherwise this is looking good.

Reviewed 38 of 42 files at r1, 3 of 5 files at r2, 1 of 20 files at r5, 2 of 11 files at r6, 1 of 1 files at r8.
Reviewable status: 12 of 43 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @imnasnainaec)

---

.github/workflows/backend.yml line 121 at r1 (raw file):

            github.com:443
            objects.githubusercontent.com:443
            ts-crl.ws.symantec.com:80

what? Hmm, codeql hits this? weird.

Code quote:

ts-crl.ws.symantec.com:80

---

Backend/Controllers/InviteController.cs line 95 at r1 (raw file):

                {
                    currentUser = user;
                    if (!user.ProjectRoles.TryGetValue(projectId, out var _roleId))

This one doesn't make sense to me. Why is it better to get a value we don't use?

---

Backend/Controllers/ProjectController.cs line 57 at r1 (raw file):

            var allUsers = await _userRepo.GetAllUsers();
            var projectUsers = allUsers.FindAll(user => user.ProjectRoles.TryGetValue(projectId, out var _roleId));

Also here, why get the value and not use it - this suggestion doesn't make sense to me.

---

Backend/Services/StatisticsService.cs line 74 at r1 (raw file):

            var allUsers = await _userRepo.GetAllUsers();
            var projectUsers = allUsers.FindAll(user => user.ProjectRoles.TryGetValue(projectId, out var _roleId));

I prefer ContainsKey if we don't go on to lookup the value.

[imnasnainaec]

Reviewable status: 12 of 43 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @jasonleenaylor)

---

docs/user_guide/assets/licenses/backend_licenses.txt line 34 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, jasonleenaylor (Jason Naylor) wrote…

? Any thoughts on why this went away?

That's puzzling. It disappears when I run on my Windows so I reran on Mac and got it back.

[jasonleenaylor]

Reviewed 3 of 42 files at r1, 2 of 5 files at r2, 7 of 7 files at r3, 16 of 20 files at r5, 8 of 11 files at r6, 3 of 4 files at r7, 1 of 1 files at r10, 1 of 1 files at r11, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @imnasnainaec)