Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SPEC 4: mention the retention policy in the SPEC #261

Closed
mattip opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

SPEC 4: mention the retention policy in the SPEC #261

mattip opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@mattip
Copy link
Contributor

mattip commented Aug 15, 2023

It turns out there is a retention policy enforced by a github action that removes any artifact if

  • there are already 5 previous version or
  • the artifact is more than 30 days old

@bsipocz is that correct?

This should be part of the SPEC, and new projects should be notified of this policy.

xref scientific-python/upload-nightly-action#34
@bsipocz bsipocz mentioned this issue Aug 16, 2023
Merged
jarrodmillman pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 17, 2023
@bsipocz
DOC: adding artefact retention policy to SPEC4 (#262)
18feb0c 
This is to address #261 
I'm on the opinion that it was a mistake to include so much
implementation detail in the SPEC itself, but as the other specifics of
https://anaconda.org/scientific-python-nightly-wheels are in the docs,
we should list these policies, too.


Also note, that we may eventually change the actual numbers, e.g.
scientific-python/upload-nightly-action#35


cc @mattip
@jarrodmillman
Copy link
Member

I thought #262 was supposed to close this. If not, we can reopen this.

@bsipocz
Copy link
Member

bsipocz commented Aug 17, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Hah, I made the beginner's mistake of not using the correct verb to auto-close. Sorry about that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jarrodmillman @mattip @bsipocz